Quantcast

Mountain State Times

Wednesday, November 27, 2024

Congressional Record publishes “Student Loan Debt Relief Plan (Executive Session)” in the Senate section on Sept. 7

Politics 10 edited

Joe Manchin, III was mentioned in Student Loan Debt Relief Plan (Executive Session) on pages S4454-S4455 covering the 2nd Session of the 117th Congress published on Sept. 7 in the Congressional Record.

The publication is reproduced in full below:

Student Loan Debt Relief Plan

Mr. President, 8 days--8 days--that is how long it took President Biden to completely erase any of the supposed deficit reduction included in the Democrats' so-called Inflation Reduction Act.

On August 24, 8 days after signing the Inflation Reduction Act into law, President Biden announced that, with the stroke of his pen, he would be forgiving $10,000 in student loan debt, $20,000 for Pell grant recipients, and taking other costly measures on student loans.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, which, incidentally, is where Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen served prior to joining the Biden administration, estimates that, all together, the President's student loan changes will cost anywhere from $440 billion to $600 billion over the next decade. The Penn Wharton Budget Model suggests it could be even worse than that, with the total cost over 10 years exceeding $1 trillion.

Now, even using the most optimistic assumptions, the Inflation Reduction Act would have only reduced the deficit by about $300 billion. President Biden's student loan plan will wipe out every single dime of that reduction and then add hundreds of billions of dollars to the debt on top of it--so much for the Democrats' commitment to reducing the deficit, which, I think, was a hoax in the first place.

There wasn't any serious commitment to it, but it only took them 8 days--8 days--to wipe it out after they crowed about it and talked about how they got Joe Manchin on board because he made a commitment to deficit reduction, which was something he supposedly insisted on in these discussions. And yet here we are. Eight days--in 8 days it is gone.

Now, I have already noted that the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates that the President's student loan measures will cost a staggering half a trillion dollars over the next decade. Here is what else the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget had to say:

The student debt cancellation and relief measures announced

. . . by the Biden administration . . . would meaningfully boost inflation.

``Would meaningfully boost inflation''--that is right. Americans have spent the majority of the Biden administration struggling with huge increases in the price of everything from gas to groceries, and the President just imposed by fiat a new policy that is likely to

``meaningfully boost inflation.''

I guess it isn't surprising. After all, it is thanks in large part to the Democrats and the President that we ended up with this inflation crisis in the first place.

As I mentioned earlier, their reckless American Rescue Plan spending spree flooded the country with unnecessary money and the economy overheated as a result. But the President's latest reckless action underscores just how committed Democrats are to big-spending and big-

government agenda.

Now, Democrats tried to suggest that they had gotten serious about the economy with their so-called Inflation Reduction Act, even though the bill was only serious about spending taxpayer dollars on ill-

considered priorities like their Green New Deal agenda. But the fact--

the fact--that it took the President exactly 8 days to wipe out any deficit reduction from the Democrats' bill tells you all you need to know about exactly how serious Democrats are about handling taxpayer dollars responsibly.

Now, I have talked for a while about why the President's student loan plans are such bad economic policy, but you don't have to take my word for it. Here is what former Obama economic adviser Jason Furman had to say about President Biden's student loan plans:

Pouring roughly half [a] trillion dollars of gasoline on the inflationary fire that already is burning is reckless. Doing it while going well beyond one campaign promise, [which is $10,000] of student loan relief, and breaking another,

[which is that] all proposals [have to be] paid for, is even worse.

That is from Obama economic adviser Jason Furman.

Another former Obama economic adviser noted:

Student loan debt relief is spending that raises demand and increases inflation. . . . It will also tend to be inflationary by raising tuitions.

Well, there are even some current Democrat Members of Congress that have expressed their concerns about the President's reckless student loan decision. And the president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, which, I mentioned, is where President Biden's very own Treasury Secretary once served on the board, issued a scathing statement in which she said:

This announcement is gallingly reckless--with the national debt approaching record levels and inflation surging, it will make both worse. . . . It would do nothing to actually make education more affordable, and if anything, this policy will drive up tuition costs while raising prices on a variety of other goods and services for ordinary Americans.

This is from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, which is where the President's own Treasury Secretary used to serve.

Let me repeat that: ``while raising prices on a variety of other goods and services for ordinary Americans.''

Well, as the Washington Post editorial board noted, American taxpayers will be footing the bill for the President's student loan decision. Ordinary Americans will pay in the form of higher prices. They will pay in the form of higher rates on loans and mortgages, and they will pay in the form of higher tuition costs.

The majority of Americans do not have student loan debt, either because they paid off their loans, never went to college, got a scholarship, or worked their way through college or were able to go thanks to their or their parents' savings. Now these Americans are going to be footing the bill for the 13 percent of Americans who do have student loan debt. Everyone is going to have to suffer economically to provide loan forgiveness for the few.

This is deeply, deeply unfair. It is unfair to expect Americans who either never went to college, paid off their loans, or paid their way through to shoulder the cost of other Americans' loans.

The President's decision is unfair to parents who scrimped and saved to send their children to college, representing a lot of American families; to the students who chose a lower cost college or worked to put themselves through; to the men and women in uniform in the military who fought for this country to earn money for their college education; and to the families struggling with high grocery bills and high energy bills and high rent prices who are likely to end up facing even more price increases, thanks to the President's student loan decisions.

And let's remember that taxpayers are going to be facing economic hardship to pay off student loans for Americans who, if they graduated from college, enjoy greater long-term earning potential than many of the Americans who will be helping to shoulder the burden for their debts.

The President's plan isn't even targeted to the most needy, with families making $250,000 a year--nearly 10 times the poverty line for a family of 4--now eligible to have their loans forgiven.

There is no doubt that the cost of a college education has risen outrageously and that, in some cases, students have been encouraged to take on unrealistic levels of debt to pay for it, but the President's student loan plan does absolutely nothing to fix these problems.

The President's plan will not only do nothing to control the cost of a college education, it will almost undoubtedly make our current situation worse. What college is going to spend time worrying about lowering tuition fees if it can expect the Federal Government to pick up part of the bill for its students' educations?

The President's plan will also do nothing to discourage students from taking on unrealistic levels of debt. In fact, it is likely to encourage students to incur even more debt since the President has now set up an expectation that the government will step in to help pay down students' loan burdens.

Given the fact that student loan debt is expected to be back to its current level in 6 years, I imagine we will be hearing more Democratic calls for student loan forgiveness in the very near future. In fact, some Members of the Democratic Party already think the President didn't go far enough. More than one Democrat wanted the President to forgive

$50,000 in debt. Now, apparently, these Democrats won't be satisfied until our economy drowns entirely under the weight of reckless government spending.

The defining achievement of the Biden administration so far has been an economy that has left millions of Americans struggling to make ends meet. Apparently, the President wants that to be his legacy because, for the sake of a few possible votes in November, he has decided to pursue yet another economic policy that will almost undoubtedly result in further economic pain for the American people.

Now he will just have to hope that his strategy doesn't backfire because, while his reckless student loan plan may buy him a vote or two, a lot of other Americans may decide that they have had their fill of inflationary spending and far-left appeasement.

I yield the floor.

I suggest the absence of a quorum.

The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.

The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.

Mr. CORNYN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.

The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so ordered.

SOURCE: Congressional Record Vol. 168, No. 143

The Congressional Record is a unique source of public documentation. It started in 1873, documenting nearly all the major and minor policies being discussed and debated.

Senators' salaries are historically higher than the median US income.

MORE NEWS